methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Expectation Mapping.
Facilitation
Expectation Mapping
Paper illustration of Stakeholder Salience Model with its method-specific working model.
Facilitation
Stakeholder Salience Model
Paper illustration of RAID Log with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Delivery
RAID Log
Paper board with the four ROAM fields Resolved, Owned, Accepted, and Mitigated.
Agile
ROAM Board
Purposedifferent
When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge.When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy.Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting.When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
45-90 min60-90 min30 min Setup, dann laufend20-40 min initial, dann laufend
Participantsdifferent
3-123-61-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone3-15
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, AgreementsSalience Diagram, Strategy per ClassRAID Log, Status Report SourceROAM Board, Owner List
Tagsno overlap
AlignmentStakeholdersTeam
StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance
RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance
RiskAgileTrackingAlignment
Add more methods