View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Expectation Mapping |  Team Design Spotify Model Mapping |  DevOps Game Day |  Team Design Team Topologies Interaction Modes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. | When a team landscape has grown without clear grouping, it maps roles and relationships onto the Spotify model. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Spotify model map and action list. | In preparing for rare incidents, the method tests response capability under controlled conditions. It shows where assumptions about stability, roles, and recovery are too optimistic. | When several teams collaborate repeatedly, it describes the right interaction mode for each interface between them. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as an interaction heat map and pairwise agreements. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 90-180 min | Halber Tag | Half day |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 5-15 | 5-20 | Team-Leads plus Architecture |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements | Spotify Model Map, Action List | Simulation Notes, Gaps List, Updated Runbooks | Interaction Heat Map, Agreements per Pair |
Tagsno overlap | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam | TeamOrganizationAlignmentDiagnosis | ResilienceOperationsIncident | TeamAlignmentCollaborationOrganization |