View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Expectation Mapping |  Agile Specification by Example |  Agile ROAM Board |  Delivery RAID Log |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 60-90 min pro Feature | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 30 min Setup, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 3-6 | 3-15 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | ROAM Board, Owner List | RAID Log, Status Report Source |
Tagsno overlap | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance |