methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Expectation Mapping.
Facilitation
Expectation Mapping
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
Paper illustration of RAID Log with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Delivery
RAID Log
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Purposedifferent
When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge.When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
45-90 min1-5 Tage30 min Setup, dann laufend1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
3-12Nutzertraffic1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyoneNutzertraffic
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncAsyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, AgreementsInterest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning NoteRAID Log, Status Report SourceClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision
Tagsno overlap
AlignmentStakeholdersTeam
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
Add more methods