View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Expectation Mapping | ![]() Product Discovery Smoke Test | ![]() Delivery RAID Log | ![]() Product Discovery Fake Door Test |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. | When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 1-5 Tage | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 1-5 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | Nutzertraffic | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | Nutzertraffic |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements | Interest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning Note | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision |
Tagsno overlap | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam | ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery |



