methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Expectation Mapping.
Facilitation
Expectation Mapping
Paper illustration of RAID Log with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Delivery
RAID Log
Paper illustration of Spotify Model Mapping with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Spotify Model Mapping
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Purposedifferent
When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge.Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting.When a team landscape has grown without clear grouping, it maps roles and relationships onto the Spotify model. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Spotify model map and action list.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
45-90 min30 min Setup, dann laufend90-180 min1-2 h
Participantsdifferent
3-121-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone5-154-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, AgreementsRAID Log, Status Report SourceSpotify Model Map, Action ListAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions
Tagsno overlap
AlignmentStakeholdersTeam
RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance
TeamOrganizationAlignmentDiagnosis
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
Add more methods