methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Expectation Mapping.
Facilitation
Expectation Mapping
Paper illustration of RAID Log with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Delivery
RAID Log
Paper illustration of Acceptance Criteria Workshop with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Agile
Acceptance Criteria Workshop
Paper board with the four ROAM fields Resolved, Owned, Accepted, and Mitigated.
Agile
ROAM Board
Purposedifferent
When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge.Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting.When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update.When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List.
Complexitysame
LowLowLowLow
Timedifferent
45-90 min30 min Setup, dann laufend20-40 min pro Story20-40 min initial, dann laufend
Participantsdifferent
3-121-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone3-63-15
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, AgreementsRAID Log, Status Report SourceAcceptance Criteria, Story UpdateROAM Board, Owner List
Tagsno overlap
AlignmentStakeholdersTeam
RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance
AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development
RiskAgileTrackingAlignment
Add more methods