View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Expectation Mapping |  Agile Planning Poker |  Facilitation Team Charter |  Team Design Team Topologies Interaction Modes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. | When a team is starting fresh or working past each other, Team Charter clarifies the shared working basis. It visibly sets out how collaboration, decision paths, and mutual conduct should work day to day. | When several teams collaborate repeatedly, it describes the right interaction mode for each interface between them. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as an interaction heat map and pairwise agreements. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 2-5 min je Item | 2-4 h | Half day |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 3-9 | 3-12 | Team-Leads plus Architecture |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates | Team Charter, Working Norms, Role Notes | Interaction Heat Map, Agreements per Pair |
Tags1 shared | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam | TeamAlignmentCollaboration | TeamAlignmentCollaborationOrganization |