methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Expectation Mapping.
Facilitation
Expectation Mapping
Paper illustration for Planning Poker.
Agile
Planning Poker
Paper illustration of RAID Log with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Delivery
RAID Log
Paper board with the four ROAM fields Resolved, Owned, Accepted, and Mitigated.
Agile
ROAM Board
Purposedifferent
When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge.When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions.Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting.When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List.
Complexitysame
LowLowLowLow
Timedifferent
45-90 min2-5 min je Item30 min Setup, dann laufend20-40 min initial, dann laufend
Participantsdifferent
3-123-91-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone3-15
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, AgreementsRelative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split CandidatesRAID Log, Status Report SourceROAM Board, Owner List
Tagsno overlap
AlignmentStakeholdersTeam
EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam
RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance
RiskAgileTrackingAlignment
Add more methods