methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Expectation Mapping.
Facilitation
Expectation Mapping
Paper illustration for PDCA Cycle.
Operations
PDCA Cycle
Paper illustration of Spotify Model Mapping with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Spotify Model Mapping
Paper illustration of the McKinsey 7S Framework with seven connected fields
Business Strategy
McKinsey 7S
Purposedifferent
When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge.For an improvement that still has to prove itself in everyday work, the method runs it through small learning loops. It connects planning, checking, and standardization into a repeatable learning mode.When a team landscape has grown without clear grouping, it maps roles and relationships onto the Spotify model. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Spotify model map and action list.McKinsey 7S checks whether Strategy, Structure, Systems, Shared Values, Skills, Style, and Staff fit together. Organizational misalignments become visible across multiple levers as a result.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
45-90 min1 h bis mehrere Wochen90-180 min2-4 h
Participantsdifferent
3-121-85-153-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, AgreementsPDCA Log, Experiment Plan, Learning Outcome, Standard ChangeSpotify Model Map, Action List7S Assessment, Alignment Gaps, Change Actions
Tagsno overlap
AlignmentStakeholdersTeam
Continuous improvementLeanExperiments
TeamOrganizationAlignmentDiagnosis
OrganizationStrategyAlignmentChange
Add more methods