View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Expectation Mapping |  Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 90-180 min | 60-90 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 4-12 | 3-6 | 3-10 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation |