methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Expectation Mapping.
Facilitation
Expectation Mapping
Paper illustration for Causal Factor Analysis.
Operations
Causal Factor Analysis
Paper illustration for Mad Sad Glad
Agile
Mad Sad Glad
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Purposedifferent
When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge.For an event with a complicated course, the method breaks down the contributing factors along the timeline. It shows how conditions, decisions, and reactions together produce a course of events.When a team's or workshop's mood needs to become readable, it structures emotional signals with little setup. It makes strain, relief, and sources of energy tangible.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighLowMedium
Timedifferent
45-90 min2-6 h30-60 min1-2 h
Participantsdifferent
3-123-103-104-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, AgreementsEvent Timeline, Causal Factor Chart, Cause List, Corrective ActionsEmotion Board, Themes, Action ItemsAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions
Tagsno overlap
AlignmentStakeholdersTeam
CausalityIncidentRoot causeTimeline
RetrospectiveTeamReflection
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
Add more methods