View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Expectation Mapping |  Operations Barrier Analysis |  Delivery RAID Log |  Operations Fault Tree Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. | For a risk that can only be managed through multiple layers of protection, the method examines the effectiveness of each barrier. It shows where safeguards are missing, too weak, or fail under real conditions. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 2-4 h | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 2-6 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 2-6 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements | Barrier Inventory, Failure Analysis per Barrier, Action Backlog | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Fault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control Actions |
Tagsno overlap | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam | Root causeSafetyIncident | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | RiskRoot causeSafety |