methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Expectation Mapping.
Facilitation
Expectation Mapping
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
Paper illustration of Team API with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Team API
Purposedifferent
When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document.
Complexitysame
LowLowLowLow
Timedifferent
45-90 min15-45 min1-2 TageHalf day initial, dann laufend
Participantsdifferent
3-121-31-4Ein Team plus Stakeholder
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, AgreementsADR File, Decision Log, RationaleArchitecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment ViewTeam API Document
Tagsno overlap
AlignmentStakeholdersTeam
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
TeamAlignmentCommunicationService
Add more methods