methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Expectation Mapping.
Facilitation
Expectation Mapping
A structured reflection surfaces what was liked, learned, lacked, and longed for. It is a conversation format and does not validate actions automatically.
Agile
4Ls Retrospective
Paper illustration for Cynefin Workshop.
Decision Making
Cynefin Workshop
Paper illustration for Mad Sad Glad
Agile
Mad Sad Glad
Purposedifferent
When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge.When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time.When problems are unclear, chaotic, or only seemingly familiar, standard recipes fall short. A Cynefin Workshop sorts situations by the nature of their problem and connects them with matching action logic.When a team's or workshop's mood needs to become readable, it structures emotional signals with little setup. It makes strain, relief, and sources of energy tangible.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
45-90 min45–75 min60-180 min30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
3-12Team members involved4-203-10
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement ActionsCynefin Map, Domain-specific Actions, Sensemaking NotesEmotion Board, Themes, Action Items
Tagsno overlap
AlignmentStakeholdersTeam
RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam
ComplexitySensemakingDecision
RetrospectiveTeamReflection
Add more methods