methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a yellow story card, blue rule cards, green example cards and a red question card on a light workspace.
Agile
Example Mapping
Paper illustration of Team API with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Team API
Paper board with the four ROAM fields Resolved, Owned, Accepted, and Mitigated.
Agile
ROAM Board
Paper illustration for Planning Poker.
Agile
Planning Poker
Purposedifferent
When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound.When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document.When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List.When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions.
Complexitysame
LowLowLowLow
Timedifferent
30-60 minHalf day initial, dann laufend20-40 min initial, dann laufend2-5 min je Item
Participantsdifferent
3-7Ein Team plus Stakeholder3-153-9
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open QuestionsTeam API DocumentROAM Board, Owner ListRelative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates
Tagsno overlap
Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement
TeamAlignmentCommunicationService
RiskAgileTrackingAlignment
EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam
Add more methods