View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Example Mapping |  Facilitation Stakeholder Mapping |  Agile Acceptance Criteria Workshop |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | When an initiative depends on many people, interests, and power dynamics, Stakeholder Mapping systematically orders the environment. It shows who influences, who is affected, and where relationship management or safeguarding matters first. | When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 60–90 min | 20-40 min pro Story | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-7 | 2-8 | 3-6 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | Stakeholder Map, Engagement Plan, Risk Notes | Acceptance Criteria, Story Update | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions |
Tagsno overlap | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | StakeholdersAlignmentFacilitationChange | AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation |