View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Example Mapping | ![]() Team Design Spotify Model Mapping | ![]() Facilitation Team Charter | ![]() Agile Three Amigos |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | When a team landscape has grown without clear grouping, it maps roles and relationships onto the Spotify model. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Spotify model map and action list. | When a team is starting fresh or working past each other, Team Charter clarifies the shared working basis. It visibly sets out how collaboration, decision paths, and mutual conduct should work day to day. | When story, test, and implementation could drift apart, it brings business perspective, engineering, and quality together early. It prevents a story from being read differently only late in the process. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 90-180 min | 2-4 h | 15-30 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-7 | 5-15 | 3-12 | 3 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | Spotify Model Map, Action List | Team Charter, Working Norms, Role Notes | Clarified Story, Test Examples, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | TeamOrganizationAlignmentDiagnosis | TeamAlignmentCollaboration | CollaborationBehavior-Driven DevelopmentQualityRefinement |



