View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Example Mapping |  Agile ROAM Board |  Agile Three Amigos |  Operations Failure Mode and Effects Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When story, test, and implementation could drift apart, it brings business perspective, engineering, and quality together early. It prevents a story from being read differently only late in the process. | For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 15-30 min | 2-6 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-7 | 3-15 | 3 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | ROAM Board, Owner List | Clarified Story, Test Examples, Open Questions | FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions |
Tagsno overlap | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | CollaborationBehavior-Driven DevelopmentQualityRefinement | RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause |