View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Example Mapping |  Decision Making PERT Estimation |  Agile Three Amigos |  Operations Failure Mode and Effects Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | On complex initiatives, a plain average tends to understate just how uncertain the outcome really is. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a PERT Estimate, Expected Value, and Risk Notes. | When story, test, and implementation could drift apart, it brings business perspective, engineering, and quality together early. It prevents a story from being read differently only late in the process. | For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 15-45 min | 15-30 min | 2-6 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-7 | 1-8 | 3 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | PERT Estimate, Expected Value, Risk Notes | Clarified Story, Test Examples, Open Questions | FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions |
Tagsno overlap | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | EstimationUncertaintyRisk | CollaborationBehavior-Driven DevelopmentQualityRefinement | RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause |