View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Example Mapping | ![]() Knowledge Modeling Ontology Design Patterns | ![]() Agile Specification by Example | ![]() Knowledge Modeling Competency Questions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | Ontology Design Patterns provide reusable building blocks for recurring modeling problems. The method brings structure to the search for clean concepts, relationships, and roles. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | Competency Questions translate a domain model into concrete questions that it must be able to answer. The method keeps the model's scope clean and prevents pretty but useless structures. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 1-3 h pro Pattern | 60-90 min pro Feature | 2-4 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-7 | 1-6 | 3-6 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | Selected Patterns, Adapted Schema Fragments, Pattern Documentation | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | Competency Question Set, Required Concepts, Test Queries, Coverage Matrix |
Tagsno overlap | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | OntologyPatternsReuseSemanticModeling | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | OntologyKnowledge graphScopeRequirementsSemantic |



