View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Example Mapping | ![]() Knowledge Modeling Competency Questions | ![]() Decision Making Delphi Method | ![]() Agile Specification by Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | Competency Questions translate a domain model into concrete questions that it must be able to answer. The method keeps the model's scope clean and prevents pretty but useless structures. | When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 2-4 h | 1-4 Wochen | 60-90 min pro Feature |
Participantsdifferent | 3-7 | 2-8 | 6-30 Experten | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | Competency Question Set, Required Concepts, Test Queries, Coverage Matrix | Expert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption Notes | Example Table, Acceptance Tests |
Tagsno overlap | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | OntologyKnowledge graphScopeRequirementsSemantic | ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development |



