View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Example Mapping |  Facilitation Barcamp |  Agile Acceptance Criteria Workshop |  Facilitation Open Space Technology |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | When many people can contribute knowledge and the flow should stay open, Barcamp provides a framework for self-organized sessions. The format channels energy without defining the content too narrowly in advance. | When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update. | When a complex topic does not yet have a fitting agenda, Open Space Technology hands topic ownership back to the participants. The format suits questions that only move forward when real interest determines the order. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | Halber Tag bis 2 Tage | 20-40 min pro Story | 0.5-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-7 | 15-200 | 3-6 | 20-500+ |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | Session Board, Session Notes, Community Learnings | Acceptance Criteria, Story Update | Session Marketplace, Proceedings, Action Topics |
Tagsno overlap | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | FacilitationLarge groupLearning | AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development | FacilitationLarge groupAutonomy |