View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Example MappingArchitecture Inception CanvasArchitecture Communication CanvasAlignment Mapping
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Example Mapping | ![]() Architecture Architecture Inception Canvas | ![]() Architecture Architecture Communication Canvas | ![]() Facilitation Alignment Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | The Architecture Inception Canvas bundles the first architecture questions into a compact decision picture. It fits when an initiative is still in motion but still needs clear guardrails. | The Architecture Communication Canvas plans architecture communication so the right people receive the right message. The method turns technical complexity into deliberate communication design. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 1-2 h | 60-120 min | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-7 | 3-8 | 2-8 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | Inception Canvas, Risks, Goal List, Open Questions | Communication Canvas, Stakeholder Messages, Architecture Communication Plan | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions |
Tagsno overlap | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | AlignmentArchitectureCanvas | ArchitectureCommunicationStakeholdersCanvas | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation |



