View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Example MappingArchitecture Decision RecordArchitecture Communication CanvasAcceptance Criteria Workshop
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Example Mapping | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record | ![]() Architecture Architecture Communication Canvas | ![]() Agile Acceptance Criteria Workshop |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | The Architecture Communication Canvas plans architecture communication so the right people receive the right message. The method turns technical complexity into deliberate communication design. | When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 15-45 min | 60-120 min | 20-40 min pro Story |
Participantsdifferent | 3-7 | 1-3 | 2-8 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Communication Canvas, Stakeholder Messages, Architecture Communication Plan | Acceptance Criteria, Story Update |
Tagsno overlap | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | ArchitectureCommunicationStakeholdersCanvas | AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development |



