View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Domain Modeling EventStorming |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Product Discovery Problem Interview |  Architecture arc42 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a domain consists of many events, rules, and states, it creates a shared modeling space for the team. It bundles language, flows, and boundaries before domain knowledge fragments into siloed views. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution. | arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 2-8 h | 15-45 min | 30-60 min je Interview | 1-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 | 1-3 | 5-12 Interviews | 1-4 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Event Timeline, Ubiquitous Language, Boundaries, Open Questions | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Problem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer Segments | Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment View |
Tagsno overlap | Domain-Driven DesignEventsDiscoveryWorkshop | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | DiscoveryInterviewsValidation | ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication |