View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Systems Thinking Evaporating Cloud | ![]() Operations Learning Review | ![]() Systems Thinking Future Reality Tree | ![]() DevOps Game Day |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | The method makes visible why two seemingly incompatible demands arise and which assumption must be tested to resolve the conflict. | After a project phase with mixed results, the method makes learning from the individual case reusable. It connects events, decisions, and systemic conditions into robust insights. | A Future Reality Tree shows how desired actions are meant to lead to a better system state. The method checks whether a path of change holds together logically before time flows into implementation. | In preparing for rare incidents, the method tests response capability under controlled conditions. It shows where assumptions about stability, roles, and recovery are too optimistic. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | High | High |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 1-3 h | 2-4 h | Halber Tag |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-10 | 3-8 | 5-20 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Conflict Cloud, Assumption List, Breakthrough Ideas, Next Experiments | Learning Review Notes, System Factors, Improvement Actions | Future Reality Tree, Negative Branches, Assumption List, Improved Injections | Simulation Notes, Gaps List, Updated Runbooks |
Tagsno overlap | Theory of ConstraintsAssumptionsSystems thinking | LearningRetrospectiveIncidentOperations | Theory of ConstraintsSystems thinkingChange | ResilienceOperationsIncident |



