View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Systems Thinking Evaporating Cloud | ![]() Operations 5 Whys | ![]() Product Strategy DIBB | ![]() Operations Kepner-Tregoe |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | The method makes visible why two seemingly incompatible demands arise and which assumption must be tested to resolve the conflict. | For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description. | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. | For a disturbance that's hard to pin down, the method cleanly separates problem, cause, and decision. It reduces mixing when symptoms allow several interpretations. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 15-30 min | 1-2 h | 2-8 h |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 2-6 | 2-8 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Conflict Cloud, Assumption List, Breakthrough Ideas, Next Experiments | Root cause notes, Countermeasures | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report | Problem Analysis, Decision Analysis, Risk Plan |
Tagsno overlap | Theory of ConstraintsAssumptionsSystems thinking | Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis | Problem solvingRoot causeDecisionOperations |



