View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Empathy Mapping |  Decision Making Option Framing |  Facilitation Consensus Workshop |  Decision Making Decision Framing Workshop |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a lot is assumed about a target group but little is seen jointly, empathy mapping makes knowledge and gaps directly comparable. The picture also shows which assumptions hold up and where evidence is missing. | In early decisions, alternatives are often still vague, incomplete, or blended together. Option Framing brings every possibility into a comparable form and makes visible which variant actually fits the question. | When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time. | When a decision is poorly framed, even good answers deliver little value. A Decision Framing Workshop sharpens the problem, goal, and boundaries before the actual weighing begins. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30–60 min | 45-120 min | 1-3 h | 60-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-8 | 3-8 | 5-30 | 4-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Empathy Map, Assumptions List, Research Gaps | Option Frames, Assumption Notes, Comparable Shortlist, Decision Inputs | Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas | Decision Frame, Decision Question, Criteria List, Evidence Plan |
Tagsno overlap | SynthesisQualitativeWorkshop | OptionsDecision framingStrategyComparison | FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment | Decision framingAlignmentCriteriaOptions |