View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Empathy Mapping |  Product Discovery Jobs to Be Done |  Business Strategy GAP Analysis |  Product Discovery Opportunity Scoring |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a lot is assumed about a target group but little is seen jointly, empathy mapping makes knowledge and gaps directly comparable. The picture also shows which assumptions hold up and where evidence is missing. | When switching motives and progress are unclear, it reconstructs the situation from real customer circumstances. It shows why a switch happens and what kind of progress is being sought. | GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing. | When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30–60 min | 1-3 Wochen | 1-3 h | 60-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-8 | 5-12 Interviews | 2-8 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Empathy Map, Assumptions List, Research Gaps | Job Stories, Outcome Statements, Opportunity List | Gap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk Notes | Opportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes |
Tagsno overlap | SynthesisQualitativeWorkshop | CustomerOutcomesNeeds | StrategyAnalysisPlanning | PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds |