View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Empathy Mapping |  Operations Ivy Lee Method |  UX Research Personas |  Operations Eat the Frog |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a lot is assumed about a target group but little is seen jointly, empathy mapping makes knowledge and gaps directly comparable. The picture also shows which assumptions hold up and where evidence is missing. | With a restless workday full of too many open items, the method creates radical simplicity. It directs attention to a short sequence instead of a broad, still-open field. | When target groups stay too vague and teams talk about the same people differently, personas create a shared, solid picture of usage. Condensed profiles make needs, contexts, and differences tangible enough for decisions. | The method protects energy and attention for the task that creates the largest progress and is often postponed. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 30–60 min | 5-10 min daily | 1-3 Tage | 15-90 min daily |
Participantsdifferent | 4-8 | 1 | Internes Team | 1 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Empathy Map, Assumptions List, Research Gaps | Daily Priority List, Completion Notes | Persona Profiles, Needs Summary, Scenario Notes | Priority Task, Completion Note, Daily Focus |
Tagsno overlap | SynthesisQualitativeWorkshop | PrioritizationProductivityExecution | ResearchCustomerSynthesis | PrioritizationProductivityFocusExecution |