View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Empathy Mapping |  Operations Getting Things Done |  UX Research Personas |  Operations Weekly Review |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a lot is assumed about a target group but little is seen jointly, empathy mapping makes knowledge and gaps directly comparable. The picture also shows which assumptions hold up and where evidence is missing. | With many open commitments and ideas in daily life, a reliable external storage system emerges. The method relieves the mind so priority and context don't have to compete in memory. | When target groups stay too vague and teams talk about the same people differently, personas create a shared, solid picture of usage. Condensed profiles make needs, contexts, and differences tangible enough for decisions. | In a week with many open loops, the method creates distance from operational noise. It organizes commitments, calendar, and projects so the next week becomes workable. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 30–60 min | 1-2 h Setup, laufend | 1-3 Tage | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-8 | 1 | Internes Team | 1 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Empathy Map, Assumptions List, Research Gaps | Action Lists, Project List, Review Routine | Persona Profiles, Needs Summary, Scenario Notes | Updated Task System, Weekly Focus, Next Actions |
Tagsno overlap | SynthesisQualitativeWorkshop | ProductivityPlanningTasksExecution | ResearchCustomerSynthesis | ProductivityExecutionPlanning |