View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Empathy Mapping |  Business Strategy GAP Analysis |  Domain Modeling EventStorming |  Product Strategy Impact Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a lot is assumed about a target group but little is seen jointly, empathy mapping makes knowledge and gaps directly comparable. The picture also shows which assumptions hold up and where evidence is missing. | GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing. | When a domain consists of many events, rules, and states, it creates a shared modeling space for the team. It bundles language, flows, and boundaries before domain knowledge fragments into siloed views. | When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30–60 min | 1-3 h | 2-8 h | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-8 | 2-8 | 5-12 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Empathy Map, Assumptions List, Research Gaps | Gap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk Notes | Event Timeline, Ubiquitous Language, Boundaries, Open Questions | Impact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery Options |
Tagsno overlap | SynthesisQualitativeWorkshop | StrategyAnalysisPlanning | Domain-Driven DesignEventsDiscoveryWorkshop | OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning |