View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Empathy Mapping |  UX Design Customer Journey Canvas |  Operations A3 Problem Solving |  UX Design Service Blueprinting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a lot is assumed about a target group but little is seen jointly, empathy mapping makes knowledge and gaps directly comparable. The picture also shows which assumptions hold up and where evidence is missing. | When a journey needs to be understood across several phases, it arranges experience, touchpoints, and opportunities into one picture. It makes gaps and friction along the user path clear. | For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together. | When a service experience is spread across several touchpoints, it brings frontstage and backstage together. It shows where user contact and internal responsibility must fit. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 30–60 min | 1-3 h | 45-90 min | 0.5-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 4-8 | 3-10 | 2-5 | 6-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Empathy Map, Assumptions List, Research Gaps | Customer Journey Canvas, Pain Points, Experience Opportunities | A3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause Analysis | Service Blueprint, Fail Points, Ownership Map |
Tagsno overlap | SynthesisQualitativeWorkshop | JourneyCustomerService designCanvas | LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations | Service designOperationsJourneyBlueprint |