View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Operations Eat the Frog |  Facilitation Power Interest Grid |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |  Operations Getting Things Done |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | The method protects energy and attention for the task that creates the largest progress and is often postponed. | When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | With many open commitments and ideas in daily life, a reliable external storage system emerges. The method relieves the mind so priority and context don't have to compete in memory. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 15-90 min daily | 30-60 min | 1-2 h | 1-2 h Setup, laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 1 | 2-8 | 4-12 | 1 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Priority Task, Completion Note, Daily Focus | Power Interest Grid, Strategy per Stakeholder | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | Action Lists, Project List, Review Routine |
Tagsno overlap | PrioritizationProductivityFocusExecution | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | ProductivityPlanningTasksExecution |