methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Dual Track Agile with its method-specific working model.
Product Discovery
Dual-Track Agile
Paper illustration for Story Points.
Agile
Story Points
Paper illustration for T-Shirt Sizing.
Agile
T-Shirt Sizing
Paper illustration for Planning Poker.
Agile
Planning Poker
Purposedifferent
When uncertainty and delivery run in parallel, it separates learning work from implementation while keeping both connected. It prevents unvalidated ideas from falling directly into the delivery stream.When teams want to rate complexity rather than hours, it creates a shared, relative scale. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Point Estimates, Reference Stories, and Velocity Data.When effort only needs to be classified roughly, it makes comparability more important than false precision. It helps sort work quickly into manageable sizes.When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
Laufend, Wochen bis Monatelaufend, 1-5 min je Item15-45 min2-5 min je Item
Participantsdifferent
4-103-92-123-9
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Discovery Backlog, Delivery Backlog, Experiment-Ergebnisse, Validierte StoriesPoint Estimates, Reference Stories, Velocity DataSize Buckets, Rough Backlog Map, Split CandidatesRelative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates
Tags1 shared
AgileDiscoveryDelivery
EstimationAgileMeasurement
EstimationAgileRoadmap
EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam
Add more methods