View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Dual-Track Agile |  Agile Specification by Example |  Decision Making Argument Mapping |  Agile Example Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When uncertainty and delivery run in parallel, it separates learning work from implementation while keeping both connected. It prevents unvalidated ideas from falling directly into the delivery stream. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | Laufend, Wochen bis Monate | 60-90 min pro Feature | 1-3 h | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-10 | 3-6 | 1-8 | 3-7 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Discovery Backlog, Delivery Backlog, Experiment-Ergebnisse, Validierte Stories | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | Argument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision Rationale | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | AgileDiscoveryDelivery | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | SensemakingDecisionRationale | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement |