methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Dual Track Agile with its method-specific working model.
Product Discovery
Dual-Track Agile
Paper illustration for Opportunity Interview
Product Discovery
Opportunity Interview
Paper illustration of two user profile cards with a goal, behavior evidence, and an open research question.
UX Research
Personas
Paper illustration for Problem Interview
Product Discovery
Problem Interview
Purposedifferent
When uncertainty and delivery run in parallel, it separates learning work from implementation while keeping both connected. It prevents unvalidated ideas from falling directly into the delivery stream.When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities.When target groups stay too vague and teams talk about the same people differently, personas create a shared, solid picture of usage. Condensed profiles make needs, contexts, and differences tangible enough for decisions.When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution.
Complexitysame
MediumMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
Laufend, Wochen bis Monate30-60 min je Interview1-3 Tage30-60 min je Interview
Participantsdifferent
4-105-12 InterviewsInternes Team5-12 Interviews
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Discovery Backlog, Delivery Backlog, Experiment-Ergebnisse, Validierte StoriesInterview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer QuotesPersona Profiles, Needs Summary, Scenario NotesProblem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer Segments
Tagsno overlap
AgileDiscoveryDelivery
DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer
ResearchCustomerSynthesis
DiscoveryInterviewsValidation
Add more methods