View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Dual-Track Agile | ![]() Product Discovery Jobs to Be Done | ![]() Product Discovery Fake Door Test | ![]() Product Discovery Opportunity Scoring |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When uncertainty and delivery run in parallel, it separates learning work from implementation while keeping both connected. It prevents unvalidated ideas from falling directly into the delivery stream. | When switching motives and progress are unclear, it reconstructs the situation from real customer circumstances. It shows why a switch happens and what kind of progress is being sought. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. | When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | Laufend, Wochen bis Monate | 1-3 Wochen | 1-5 Tage | 60-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-10 | 5-12 Interviews | Nutzertraffic | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Discovery Backlog, Delivery Backlog, Experiment-Ergebnisse, Validierte Stories | Job Stories, Outcome Statements, Opportunity List | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision | Opportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes |
Tagsno overlap | AgileDiscoveryDelivery | CustomerOutcomesNeeds | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery | PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds |



