View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Dual-Track Agile |  Decision Making Assumption Surfacing |  Product Discovery Opportunity Scoring |  Product Strategy DIBB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When uncertainty and delivery run in parallel, it separates learning work from implementation while keeping both connected. It prevents unvalidated ideas from falling directly into the delivery stream. | Plans often contain assumptions that were never openly stated and remain dangerous precisely because of that. Assumption Surfacing makes these silent premises visible and prioritizes which of them carry the initiative or could sink it. | When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes. | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | Laufend, Wochen bis Monate | 45-90 min | 60-120 min | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 4-10 | 2-8 | 3-6 | 2-8 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Discovery Backlog, Delivery Backlog, Experiment-Ergebnisse, Validierte Stories | Assumption List, Critical Assumptions, Learning Plan | Opportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report |
Tagsno overlap | AgileDiscoveryDelivery | AssumptionsRiskDecisionDiscovery | PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis |