View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Double DiamondSpecification by ExampleArchitecture Decision RecordQuality Attribute Workshop
| Criterion |  Innovation Double Diamond |  Agile Specification by Example |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Architecture Quality Attribute Workshop |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For complex problems with a fuzzy situation, the method cleanly separates search space and decision. It first creates breadth in understanding and then focus in elaboration. This brings open questions, problem definition, and solution path into a traceable movement. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | A Quality Attribute Workshop translates quality requirements into concrete scenarios and architecture impulses. The method brings product, engineering, and operations to the same view of desired properties. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | Wochen bis Monate | 60-90 min pro Feature | 15-45 min | 2-4 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 3-6 | 1-3 | 5-15 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Problem Statement, Solution Options, Prototypes, Deliverables per Phase | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Quality Scenarios, Priority List, Architecture Concerns |
Tagsno overlap | ProcessDivergenceInnovation | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | RequirementsArchitectureWorkshop |