methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Double Diamond with its method-specific working model.
Innovation
Double Diamond
Paper illustration for Solution Interview
Product Discovery
Solution Interview
Surveys method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
Surveys
Paper illustration for Problem Interview
Product Discovery
Problem Interview
Purposedifferent
For complex problems with a fuzzy situation, the method cleanly separates search space and decision. It first creates breadth in understanding and then focus in elaboration. This brings open questions, problem definition, and solution path into a traceable movement.When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation.When a topic needs to be validated broadly and many people can answer the same question, surveys gather structured feedback in a scalable form. Answers become comparable and segmentable instead of remaining merely anecdotal.When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution.
Complexitysame
MediumMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
Wochen bis Monate30-60 min je Interview3-14 Tage30-60 min je Interview
Participantsdifferent
3-125-10 Interviews50+5-12 Interviews
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Problem Statement, Solution Options, Prototypes, Deliverables per PhaseSolution Feedback, Objection List, Validation NotesSurvey Results, Charts, Segment InsightsProblem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer Segments
Tagsno overlap
ProcessDivergenceInnovation
ValidationInterviewsPrototype
QuantitativeResearchValidation
DiscoveryInterviewsValidation
Add more methods