View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Innovation Double Diamond |  Delivery RAID Log |  Innovation Design Thinking |  Agile ROAM Board |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For complex problems with a fuzzy situation, the method cleanly separates search space and decision. It first creates breadth in understanding and then focus in elaboration. This brings open questions, problem definition, and solution path into a traceable movement. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | For complex user problems with an uncertain cause, the method connects observation, interpretation, and experiment into a learning cycle. It keeps the focus on real needs and avoids premature solution language. This produces robust decisions for product and service. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | High | Low |
Timedifferent | Wochen bis Monate | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 1 Tag bis mehrere Wochen | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 4-10 | 3-15 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Problem Statement, Solution Options, Prototypes, Deliverables per Phase | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Problem Statement, Prototype, Test Learnings | ROAM Board, Owner List |
Tagsno overlap | ProcessDivergenceInnovation | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | InnovationPrototypeResearch | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment |