View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Innovation Double Diamond |  Agile Acceptance Criteria Workshop |  Agile ROAM Board |  Delivery RAID Log |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For complex problems with a fuzzy situation, the method cleanly separates search space and decision. It first creates breadth in understanding and then focus in elaboration. This brings open questions, problem definition, and solution path into a traceable movement. | When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | Wochen bis Monate | 20-40 min pro Story | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 30 min Setup, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 3-6 | 3-15 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Problem Statement, Solution Options, Prototypes, Deliverables per Phase | Acceptance Criteria, Story Update | ROAM Board, Owner List | RAID Log, Status Report Source |
Tagsno overlap | ProcessDivergenceInnovation | AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance |