View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Innovation Double Diamond |  Growth A/B Testing |  Product Discovery Assumption Mapping |  Innovation Design Sprint |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For complex problems with a fuzzy situation, the method cleanly separates search space and decision. It first creates breadth in understanding and then focus in elaboration. This brings open questions, problem definition, and solution path into a traceable movement. | When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects. | When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first. | When the product question is unclear and time pressure is high, the method takes a team from an open idea to a testable solution. It connects problem understanding, decision, and learning in one compact format, lowering the risk of spending a lot of energy on a mere guess. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | Wochen bis Monate | 1-4 Wochen | 45-60 min | 4-5 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 1-6 | 2-8 | 5-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Problem Statement, Solution Options, Prototypes, Deliverables per Phase | Experiment results, Decision log, Learning summary | Assumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking | Prototype, Test Findings, Decision Rationale |
Tagsno overlap | ProcessDivergenceInnovation | ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation | AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation | Design sprintPrototypeValidationInnovation |