methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Double Diamond with its method-specific working model.
Innovation
Double Diamond
A/B Testing workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
A/B Testing
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
Purposedifferent
For complex problems with a fuzzy situation, the method cleanly separates search space and decision. It first creates breadth in understanding and then focus in elaboration. This brings open questions, problem definition, and solution path into a traceable movement.When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects.arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighLowLow
Timedifferent
Wochen bis Monate1-4 Wochen1-2 Tage1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
3-121-61-4Nutzertraffic
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Problem Statement, Solution Options, Prototypes, Deliverables per PhaseExperiment results, Decision log, Learning summaryArchitecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment ViewInterest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning Note
Tagsno overlap
ProcessDivergenceInnovation
ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
Add more methods