View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Innovation Double Diamond | ![]() Agile 4Ls Retrospective | ![]() Operations A3 Problem Solving | ![]() Agile Start Stop Continue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For complex problems with a fuzzy situation, the method cleanly separates search space and decision. It first creates breadth in understanding and then focus in elaboration. This brings open questions, problem definition, and solution path into a traceable movement. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together. | When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | Wochen bis Monate | 45–75 min | 45-90 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | Team members involved | 2-5 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Problem Statement, Solution Options, Prototypes, Deliverables per Phase | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | A3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause Analysis | Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions |
Tagsno overlap | ProcessDivergenceInnovation | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations | RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection |



