View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Facilitation World Café |  Facilitation Open Space Technology |  Facilitation Nominal Group Technique |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | When a group needs to connect many viewpoints in a short time, World Café creates a calm alternation between closeness and rotation. It sets thinking in motion without forcing the conversation into full-plenary rigidity. | When a complex topic does not yet have a fitting agenda, Open Space Technology hands topic ownership back to the participants. The format suits questions that only move forward when real interest determines the order. | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 5-15 min | 60-180 min | 0.5-2 Tage | 60-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-20 | 12-100+ | 20-500+ | 5-12 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Table Notes, Emergent Themes, Shared Questions | Session Marketplace, Proceedings, Action Topics | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority |
Tags1 shared | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | FacilitationDialogueLarge groupSensemaking | FacilitationLarge groupAutonomy | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion |