View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Agile Three Amigos |  Facilitation Consensus Workshop |  Agile Acceptance Criteria Workshop |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | When story, test, and implementation could drift apart, it brings business perspective, engineering, and quality together early. It prevents a story from being read differently only late in the process. | When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time. | When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 5-15 min | 15-30 min | 1-3 h | 20-40 min pro Story |
Participantsdifferent | 3-20 | 3 | 5-30 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Clarified Story, Test Examples, Open Questions | Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas | Acceptance Criteria, Story Update |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | CollaborationBehavior-Driven DevelopmentQualityRefinement | FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment | AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development |