methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of shared options, independently placed voting dots, and a highlighted shortlist.
Facilitation
Dot Voting
Surveys method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
Surveys
Paper illustration of the Lightning Decision Jam working structure.
Facilitation
Decision Jam
Paper illustration of ICE Scoring with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
ICE Scoring
Purposedifferent
When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection.When a topic needs to be validated broadly and many people can answer the same question, surveys gather structured feedback in a scalable form. Answers become comparable and segmentable instead of remaining merely anecdotal.When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer.When ideas need sorting quickly, it condenses impact, confidence, and effort into one compact score. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as an ICE table and top-ideas list.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
5-15 min3-14 Tage60-90 min30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
3-2050+4-102-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Ranked list, Consensus signal, ShortlistSurvey Results, Charts, Segment InsightsProblem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, ExperimentICE Table, Top Idea List
Tagsno overlap
FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization
QuantitativeResearchValidation
FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop
PrioritizationScoringGrowthDecision
Add more methods