methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of shared options, independently placed voting dots, and a highlighted shortlist.
Facilitation
Dot Voting
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
Paper illustration for ABC Analysis
Operations
ABC Analysis
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Purposedifferent
When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection.When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.With many similar objects of differing economic significance, the method prioritizes effort by effect. It separates what needs regular steering from what rarely needs attention.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
5-15 min1-5 Tage30-60 min1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
3-20Nutzertraffic1-5Nutzertraffic
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncAsyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Ranked list, Consensus signal, ShortlistInterest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning NoteABC Classification, Focus Rules, Control ListClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision
Tagsno overlap
FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
PrioritizationOperationsPortfolio
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
Add more methods