View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Dot Voting | ![]() Product Discovery Smoke Test | ![]() Operations ABC Analysis | ![]() Product Discovery Fake Door Test |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all. | With many similar objects of differing economic significance, the method prioritizes effort by effect. It separates what needs regular steering from what rarely needs attention. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 5-15 min | 1-5 Tage | 30-60 min | 1-5 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-20 | Nutzertraffic | 1-5 | Nutzertraffic |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Interest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning Note | ABC Classification, Focus Rules, Control List | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth | PrioritizationOperationsPortfolio | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery |



